Islamabad [Pakistan], September 15 (ANI): Pakistan’s ruling coalition has put on hold till Sunday, the proposed constitutional package, which was likely to be tabled in both houses of parliament on Saturday for “strategic reasons” coming from the hurdles in mustering up the two-thirds majority in both houses, Dawn reported.
Though no explanation has been given by the government for the delay in the introduction of the set of constitutional amendments, the Pak daily reported, citing an informed source in the coalition, that the delay had “something to do with the numbers game” in the Senate.
He explained that the government was short of one member in the Senate, where 64 votes were required for the amendment. The Senate chairman, a PPP member, cannot vote.
In the National Assembly, the coalition needs several lawmakers to meet the two-thirds threshold of 224, the source said everything was in order in the lower house, particularly after the oath-taking of PPP’s Makhdoom Tahir Rashid from NA-171.
“Things have been managed and the [constitutional] package will be passed by both houses on Sunday,” the source seemed assured.
Being asked why the bill was not tabled in the National Assembly if the government had the required strength, the insider cited “strategic reasons”. “We want it to be passed from both houses the same day as a matter of strategy.”
“A few of them will have to render sacrifices,” he said referring to the rule of disqualification for voting against the party lines. The votes, however, will be counted under a proposed amendment, which might have retrospective effect
“Things have been managed now and the package will be passed by both the houses on Sunday,” he said confidently.
Notably, the constitutional package has remained a guarded secret, without any official word on its contents, amid speculations that the government plans to give extension to the top judge.
Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar on Saturday shared parts of the package with the upper house, which included an amendment to Article 63-A of the Constitution, dealing with disqualification of those who cross party line in voting for a constitutional amendment, as reported by Dawn.
He explained that under the amendment, the vote of the members against whom a disqualification reference was filed by their party leadership would be counted.
Under another amendment, the incumbent chief election commissioner will continue to hold office, till his successor comes in. Dar also said constitutional courts would be established to adjudicate upon constitutional petitions.
Reagrding the decision to amend Article 63-A of the Constitution, the Deputy PM claimed that the SC bench headed by the then chief justice Umar Ata Bandial had misinterpreted the article, when he decided that the votes of those who went against the party lines on matters entailing disqualification would not be counted.
About the continuation of the chief election commissioner even after completing his five-year term, he recalled how the ECP remained dysfunctional for 17 months in the past.
“I am not privy to the entire bill…I am just giving the pulse,” the leader of the house said, inviting the opposition to help them bring judicial reforms in the country. He urged there was a need to bring changes in the laws to make court decisions time bound. “We will get nothing by entering into blame game,” he remarked.
The foreign minister said opposition leader was wrong in saying that the government was hiding the details of its Constitutional Package and added that the major proposals were being discussed in special parliamentary committee recently formed after September 9 arrests of PTI MNAs from Parliament House and the PTI was part of the consultations.
“We are not hiding things but every government has its own strategy.”
The leader of the house indicated that the government was ready to withdraw a proposal of extending the retirement age of judges on the suggestion of JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman, which was endorsed by other members of the special committees.
“In the meeting, I advised the law minister not to extend the age if there is a categorical feeling that this is being done to oblige someone,” he said. An informed source, however, claimed that the amendment to increase the retirement age of superior court judges was still part of the package.
Earlier, Leader of the Opposition Syed Shibli Faraz, while addressing the house, alleged that the ruling coalition was so far ‘hiding’ the contours of the proposed constitutional amendments from the lawmakers.
“In the normal circumstances, you sell your proposed legislation to the public and the legislators,” he observed. He, however, said the proposal to make structural changes in the constitution was kept as a secret as the intent was mala fide. He further alleged that the government lacked a two-thirds majority to get it passed and was forcing the members of PTI to change their loyalties, as reported by Dawn.
The opposition leader alleged that the government has added to the “mystery” surrounding the proposed law and questioned the reason behind the summoning of the session on an official holiday.
He deplored that PPP, which was a champion of democracy, was also getting itself involved in the process and warned that “it will have to pay a political price” for it. (ANI)
Disclaimer: This story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed of ANI; only the image & headline may have been reworked by News Services Division of World News Network Inc Ltd and Palghar News and Pune News and World News
HINDI, MARATHI, GUJARATI, TAMIL, TELUGU, BENGALI, KANNADA, ORIYA, PUNJABI, URDU, MALAYALAM
For more details and packages
